There is nothing scholarly about JW teachings-- far from it! The idea they are pushing is obviously to answer legitimate criticism that they were misapplying the meaning or inference in the work of serious writers. The result is to give the impression to their captive flock that their nasty propaganda is scholarly and accurate.
To be authoritative you need to accurately quote, not just from any old writer but from academic sources which are peer reviewed. JW writers entirely miss the importance of this.
What though is the use of meticulously quoted books for the purpose of untruthful propaganda?
Note they do not try to discover anything new or push the boundaries of knowledge let alone delve into the true origins of Bible texts. Their whole purpose is to justify their precious doctrines which are equivalent to the useless goods which snake oil merchants peddle.